Scope

JPPMI | JOURNAL INFORMATION

Focus and Scope

Advancing evidence-informed community engagement, empowerment, and sustainable community development.

1. Aims

Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pengembangan Masyarakat Indonesia (JPPMI) is a peer-reviewed, open-access scholarly journal dedicated to community engagement, community empowerment, and evidence-informed development initiatives.

The journal provides an academic platform for documenting, evaluating, and disseminating community-based interventions implemented by academics, practitioners, government institutions, civil society organizations, and other relevant stakeholders.

JPPMI aims to strengthen scholarly community engagement through systematic needs assessment, intervention design, meaningful stakeholder participation, transparent implementation, appropriate outcome evaluation, and consideration of program sustainability.

The journal welcomes multidisciplinary contributions that address identified community needs through collaborative, participatory, culturally responsive, and sustainable approaches.

2. Journal Focus

The primary focus of JPPMI is the implementation and evaluation of community-based programs designed to strengthen community knowledge, skills, participation, institutional capacity, resilience, independence, well-being, and sustainable use of local resources.

JPPMI prioritizes scholarly articles that demonstrate substantive community engagement and provide credible evidence of program implementation and outcomes, rather than merely describing activities.

3. Core Subject Areas

JPPMI considers multidisciplinary community engagement and development manuscripts within the following seven thematic areas. All submissions must demonstrate a substantive community-based intervention or development component.

SUBJECT AREA 01

Community Empowerment and Social Development

Participatory community development, social inclusion, community resilience, poverty reduction, institutional capacity building, social innovation, volunteerism, and empowerment programs for vulnerable or underserved populations.

SUBJECT AREA 02

Community Health and Well-Being

Community health promotion, disease prevention, nutrition education, maternal and child health, environmental health, sanitation, mental health promotion, healthy lifestyles, and community-based health empowerment initiatives.

SUBJECT AREA 03

Education, Literacy, and Human Capacity Development

Community education, digital and financial literacy, scientific literacy, inclusive education, teacher and youth development, vocational skills, lifelong learning, and community-oriented educational innovations.

SUBJECT AREA 04

Local Economic Development and Social Entrepreneurship

Development of micro, small, and medium enterprises; entrepreneurship; cooperatives; financial inclusion; local product innovation; creative industries; community marketing; and economic empowerment initiatives.

SUBJECT AREA 05

Appropriate Technology and Digital Transformation

Application, adaptation, and transfer of appropriate technology, digital platforms, information systems, community-oriented product development, and technological innovations designed to address identified community needs.

SUBJECT AREA 06

Environment, Agriculture, and Sustainable Communities

Environmental conservation, waste management, climate adaptation, food security, sustainable agriculture, fisheries, coastal and rural development, disaster preparedness, and sustainable management of local resources.

SUBJECT AREA 07

Culture, Local Knowledge, and Community Cohesion

Preservation and application of local knowledge, cultural development, social cohesion, intercultural engagement, community arts, and culturally responsive approaches to community empowerment and development.

4. Eligible Community Engagement Contributions

JPPMI primarily considers original scholarly articles documenting and critically evaluating:

  • Implementation and evaluation of community-based interventions.
  • Participatory action and community empowerment programs.
  • Community education, training, mentoring, and capacity building.
  • Application, adaptation, or transfer of appropriate technology to communities.
  • Development and evaluation of community-based innovations or models.
  • Evidence-informed community engagement case studies with transferable lessons.
  • Critical evaluation of program outcomes, limitations, and sustainability.

Article Classification: These categories describe eligible forms of community engagement within JPPMI's principal manuscript type. They do not establish separate manuscript types unless otherwise specified in the journal's official submission policies.

5. Manuscript Expectations

Submitted manuscripts should provide transparent and academically meaningful reporting of the following components:

Component Expected Reporting
Community Context Characteristics of the target community and identified problems.
Needs Assessment Relevant baseline evidence and rationale for the intervention.
Community Participation Community partners, participants, and stakeholder involvement.
Intervention Methods Program design, implementation stages, setting, and procedures.
Evaluation Outcome indicators and appropriate evaluation methods.
Results and Discussion Evidence-supported results, critical interpretation, and relevant literature.
Limitations Implementation constraints and limitations of outcome evaluation.
Sustainability Follow-up plans and realistic potential for continuity or replication.
Ethics Relevant permissions, informed consent, privacy safeguards, and approvals where required.

6. Submissions Outside the Journal's Scope

JPPMI does not normally consider manuscripts that fall into the following categories:

  1. Conventional research without substantive community engagement or development activities.
  2. Descriptive reports that only document activities without systematic implementation details or meaningful outcome evaluation.
  3. Ceremonial events, one-time social activities, or donation programs without clear empowerment or capacity-building components.
  4. Manuscripts that fail to identify the community problem, intervention, target partners, or reported outcomes adequately.
  5. Routine classroom teaching without direct and meaningful engagement with a community.
  6. Contributions unrelated to community engagement, empowerment, or sustainable community development.

Important Distinction: Conducting an activity in a community does not automatically qualify it as a scholarly community engagement article. Manuscripts must demonstrate an identifiable community need, substantive intervention, appropriate evaluation, and credible evidence supporting reported outcomes.

7. Editorial Assessment Principles

Manuscript suitability is assessed according to journal scope, scholarly quality, relevance of community needs, intervention design, stakeholder participation, methodological transparency, ethical compliance, and strength of outcome evidence.

Community engagement programs may use quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method evaluation approaches. The appropriate evaluation method depends on the program objectives, context, and outcomes.

Statistical significance is not a universal requirement for community engagement publications. However, authors must provide credible and proportionate evidence for claims concerning knowledge, skills, behavior, institutional capacity, or other community outcomes.