How authors revise articles based on reviewer comments

Revision Standards for Authors

To All Esteemed Authors,

In an effort to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of the article revision process, we are implementing the following new standards:

  • Change Indication:
    • All sentences modified or added during the revision process must be highlighted in red.
    • This is to facilitate the editorial team's review and verification of the changes made.
  • Objectives:
    • This standardization will expedite the revision checking process.
    • It will improve accuracy in the revision process.
    • It will streamline collaboration between authors and editors.

We expect these standards to be adhered to by all authors to ensure the smooth progress of the publication process.

Thank you for your cooperation and attention.

Sincerely,

Editorial Team

 

Additional Tips:

  • If you disagree with a reviewer's comment, explain your reasoning respectfully and provide evidence to support your position.
  • If you need to conduct additional experiments or analyses to address a reviewer's concern, state that you will do so and provide a timeline.
  • If a reviewer asks for a clarification about a specific point, and the clarification does not require a manuscript revision, then clearly explain the concept in your response.
  • If there are multiple reviewers, create a separate response to each reviewer.
  • If the journal provides a specific template for responses, use it.
  • If you are unsure how to respond to a particular comment, consult with a co-author or mentor.

Revision guidelines for authors are:

  1. The revision format can be accessed at the URL: Download (File 1: Author Response, the author fills in the table in the document according to the reviewer's suggestions or comments)
  2. The revised manuscript is colored red for revised words or sentences or paragraphs (File 2: Revised manuscript)
  3. There are 2 uploaded documents in the UPLOAD REVISION section